I beg everyone's pardon for this clumsy intrusion into
unknown territory, but this is all I can do to contact
the developers and experienced users of `syncdraw' via
NNTP. Its ALT+F1..F10 palettes do not seem to contain
such pseudographical characters as ## 182 and 199 in
terms of CP 437, which prevents junctions between ver-
tical double-width and horisontal single-width lines.
Are they absent by design?
I beg everyone's pardon for this clumsy intrusion into
unknown territory, but this is all I can do to contact
the developers and experienced users of `syncdraw' via
NNTP. Its ALT+F1..F10 palettes do not seem to contain
such pseudographical characters as ## 182 and 199 in
terms of CP 437, which prevents junctions between ver-
tical double-width and horisontal single-width lines.
Are they absent by design?
I beg everyone's pardon for this clumsy intrusion
into unknown territory, but this is all I can do to
contact the developers and experienced users of
`syncdraw' via NNTP. Its ALT+F1..F10 palettes do not
seem to contain such pseudographical characters as
## 182 and 199 in terms of CP 437, which prevents
junctions between vertical double-width and horison-
tal single-width lines. Are they absent by design?
https://i.imgur.com/IibsieP.png
Anton Shepelev wrote to All <=-
MRO to Anton Shepelev:
I beg everyone's pardon for this clumsy intrusion
into unknown territory, but this is all I can do to
contact the developers and experienced users of
`syncdraw' via NNTP. Its ALT+F1..F10 palettes do not
seem to contain such pseudographical characters as
## 182 and 199 in terms of CP 437, which prevents
junctions between vertical double-width and horison-
tal single-width lines. Are they absent by design?
https://i.imgur.com/IibsieP.png
Many thanks for a direct image link that does not lead
some bloated webpage!
Ouch -- you have font smoothing (aka BlearType) on,
which is so UnANSIstematic. Please, take a closer look
at the characters in `syncdraw' and in the terminal win-
dow, for they are different. The ones in the terminal
are those that I seek, and do not find, in the ANSI edi-
tor. The ones in `syncdraw' are ## 185 and 204.
https://i.imgur.com/IibsieP.png
Many thanks for a direct image link that does not lead
some bloated webpage!
Ouch -- you have font smoothing (aka BlearType) on,
which is so UnANSIstematic. Please, take a closer look
at the characters in `syncdraw' and in the terminal win-
dow, for they are different. The ones in the terminal
are those that I seek, and do not find, in the ANSI edi-
tor. The ones in `syncdraw' are ## 185 and 204.
Ouch -- you have font smoothing (aka BlearType)
on, which is so UnANSIstematic. Please, take a
closer look
and you are super wordy. those characters are
ascii, not ansi.
Please, take a closer look at the characters in
`syncdraw' and in the terminal win- dow, for they
are different. The ones in the terminal are those
that I seek, and do not find, in the ANSI editor.
The ones in `syncdraw' are ## 185 and 204.
oh, now i know what you mean. i was drowned a bub-
bling brook of babble.
just use a different ansi editor. or contact the
author. nobody uses mysticdraw/syncdraw so they
didn't notice.
get a copy of thedraw registered
https://i.imgur.com/S4YJ4KC.png
I meant the general aesthetics of ANSI-art, and no,
those characters are not part of the ASCII 7-bit en-
coding:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ASCII#/media/File:USASCII_code_chart.png dude, do you realize that wikipedia is just a website that anybody can edit. that's high ascii.
I will try. This being Synchronet, I thought `sync-
draw' would be a bit more popular here...
I never managed to get a properly registered, rathen
than brutally cracked, copy of the latest version of
TheDraw. I have tried some that claimed to be "regis-
tered", but they were either old, or buggy, or
cracked, or all of those. Futhermore, I prefer a Free
program to a proprietary one.
Sysop: | Kurt Hamm |
---|---|
Location: | Columbia, SC |
Users: | 7 |
Nodes: | 20 (0 / 20) |
Uptime: | 228:29:03 |
Calls: | 2,774 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 64 |
Messages: | 848,178 |